Development of 1-Ton Land-Rovers


The first attempt to build a landrover with a significantly larger payload than a normal long wheelbase resulted in two seperate projects being engineered. The first was the forward control, eventually put into production in 1962. This vehicle was developed to meet demands for increased payload capacity and off-road load carrying performance. Rather than design an entirely new machine, Land-Rover modified the existing long wheelbase chassis to have a sub frame mounted above the chassis rails to carry the truck like body. Some body components were shared with the normal control model, but the vehicle had a very different appearance to the conventional Land-Rover.



Landrover was also developing at the same time a vehicle intended to compete with the large pickups selling well in the middle east, and so they designed what was basically an oversize Landrover, identified as a 129” due to its longer wheelbase. They were also the first Landrovers called “1-Tons” although they woud have actually had an even higher payload. The 129” saw some interesting ideas being tried out including a turbocharged 2286 diesel engine, and even a 2.5 turbo diesel, but most used the 3-litre six cylinder petrol used in Rover cars of the period. The design was not successful and the 129” never made i tinto production, although it may well have been in the back of the engineers minds when they designed the eventual production 1-Ton.


The Forward Control did make it into production and technologically, the vehicle used the same engines as the other models, but had a lower ratio transfer box. Early IIa models had rover axles, but later ones went over to ENV axles. The tyres were 900x16 size and the wheels had an increased offset to fit. At around the same time, Land-Rover was developing a number of vehicles for both military and civilian specialist applications. Some military models had gained extended spring hangers and reinforced chassis frame, using similar components to the Forward Control. An early example of this was the APGP amphibious Land-Rover 109.

Likewise, Land-Rover was developing modifications such as lift platforms on the back of 109s, fire engines, ambulances and a wide spectrum of other modifications. The problem was that the chassis and suspension of the conventional long wheelbase was stretched to the limit by the time these modifications had been carried out, and the conventional four cylinder engines were often underpowered by the time the specialist bodywork had been fitted. Of course, the forward control could fulfil some of these roles, but was often too big for some applications.

In time, the IIA forward control was found wanting in performance, it was underpowered and was found to be unstable in some circumstances, so a much improved version, the IIB was produced. This had a wider track, a rear axle mounted under the springs, and a host of other minor improvements. The biggest was the use of the six cylinder 2.6 litre petrol engine in this model.


The 1-Ton 109" Land-Rover was unveiled in September 1968 at the Commercial Motor Show as an uprated version of the 109" Long Wheelbase Land-Rover. The vehicle was specified as having a 2.6 litre six cylinder petrol engine, and the gear and transfer boxes as for the IIB forward control. Although initial specifications offered a 2286 petrol engine as an option, none were built for civillian owners. The axles were heavy-duty ENV units the same as used on the IIA FC (Not the 101FC as some sources claim - the 101 used Salisbury axle assemblies). Later series IIIs had front and rear Salisbury axles from about late 1972 (suffix B), and later still the front differential became the standard Rover unit (Suffix C). The Salisbury was often used as an in-service replacement for vehicles fitted with ENVs. The chassis frame was a reinforced item, featuring drop shackle suspension pioneered on military vehicles. Production models had a bolt-off gearbox crossmember. The 900x16 tyres on extra deep dish rims were carried over from the forward control. Longer brake pipes were fitted as well as a brake servo, front brakes being wider than standard with 3" shoes. The rear brakes were the same as a conventional 109". The overall aim was twofold - to allow the Long Wheelbase Land Rover carry a greater payload, and also to provide a more suitable chassis for specialist conversions.

Although the first 1 ton was built in September 1968, production got underway properly in April 1969 when vehicle number two was built, and all these vehicles had the headlamps in the wings - my own vehicle suggests that early models also had deep sills. Vehicles 229/1 to 229/15 had A suffix chassis and presumably all these early features. 1 Tons may have had the lamps in the wings before other models to make the lamp height comply with lighting laws, or just to signify them as a "new" model. When production changed to the series III in September 1971, 170 1-Tons series IIA had been built. Production continued into the Series III era, and 238 home market Series IIIs were built. Export vehicles existed in smaller numbers. The first LHD export IIA is noted as being built in January 1968 and exported to Belgium, but this is almost certainly a mistake in the record book, January 1969 is much more likely. LHD export vehicles generally found their way to Europe, with Belgium, Denmark and Portugal having several examples each. RHD export vehicles were most commonly sent to African states.

It is interesting that the chassis was built as a composite to be either right or left hand drive, and had both holes for the steering relay, rather than just one as would be seen on other models. Presumably Land-Rover rationalised it in this way in anticipation of low order numbers.

The 1-Ton 109 was also fitted with a distinct steering box, which sat in the normal position, but was of a lower ratio. This was presumably to compensate for the drag caused by the 900x16 tyres. The steering was also fitted with an hydraulic damper, to reduce feedback. The suspension was unique for the rear axle, although still under slung, but the front was fitted with diesel 109 springs so as to cope with the expected payload. This gave the machine a rather hard ride, but the size of the tyres also makes the vehicle rather bouncy, certainly the ride is improved by having a load in the back!

A number of these vehicles were fitted with winches, and Land-Rover made appropriate power take offs to suit the 1-Ton gearbox.